| Biochemistry Faculty |
| Scott Briggs |
| Steve Broyles |
| Clint Chapple |
| Harry Charbonneau |
| James Clemens |
| James Forney |
| Frederick S. Gimble |
| Barbara Golden |
| Mark Hall |
| Mark Hermodson |
| Ann Kirchmaier |
| Xiaoqi Liu |
| Joe Ogas |
| Sandra Rossie |
| W. Andy Tao |
| Henry Weiner |
| H. Lee Weith |
| Adjunct Faculty |
| Jon Lebowitz |
| Emeritus Professors |
| Karl Brandt |
| Bernard Axelrod |
| Klaus Herrmann |
| Ki-Han Kim |
| Gunter Kohlhaw |
| David Krogmann |
| Victor Rodwell |
| Ronald Somerville |
| Roy Whistler |
| Howard Zalkin |
Scott D. BriggsAssistant Professor of Biochemistry Investigators: Area: Role of histone methylation in gene expression and oncogenesis |
![]() |
In the eukaryotic cell, DNA is associated with protein factors to form chromatin. The fundamental repeating unit of chromatin is called the nucleosome where 146 base pairs of DNA is wrapped around two copies of each histone protein (H3, H4, H2A, and H2B). An important role for histone proteins is to help in the compaction of our genome into the nucleus of the cell. However, this compaction of DNA can restrict nuclear factors from gaining access to the DNA template. Therefore, somehow this inherently restrictive environment must be regulated and organized to allow permissive cellular processes such as gene transcription, replication, recombination, repair, and chromosomal segregation. One of the mechanisms that regulate chromatin structure and function is histone modifying complexes that posttranslationally modify histones. Generally, all of the histone modifications have been located on the N- and C-terminal tail domains (see figure). However, recent evidence has indicated novel modification sites within the central part of the histone called the histone fold-domain. Since posttranslational modifications on histones such as acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and/or methylation can influence the chromatin environment and ultimately gene expression, we are interested in studying the machinery that mediates these modifications and how mis-regulation of these enzymes can lead to a disease state.
Histone methylation and regulation Recent work on histone methylation has lead to the identification of histone methylation sites and their corresponding methyltransferases. Histone methylation has now been identified on lysine (Lys) and arginine (Arg) residues on histone H3 and H4 (see figure). The catalytic core for some but not all lysine histone methyltransferases (HMTs) resides in the SET domain. A domain named for its appearance in Su(var) 3-9 (suppressor of position effect variegation), E(z) (enhancer of zeste), and Trx (trithorax). In contrast to lysine HMTs, arginine HMTs do not contain a SET domain but have highly conserved non-contiguous amino acid residues that are essential for forming its catalytic core. With the identification of these methyltransferases and their sites of methylation on histones, it is becoming clear methylation can organize chromatin into an active or repressed state. In pursuing this modification, my lab has largely exploited the strengths of yeast and mammalian model organisms in combination with biochemistry and molecular biology techniques. We are currently using budding yeast as a model system to understand how these methyltransferases are regulated and to determine their cellular functions. Methyltransferases and cancer Many SET domain-containing proteins have been associated with human cancers suggesting that they play an important regulatory roll in the cell. However, only a few have been identified as histone methyltransferases such as MLL1 and EZH2. Many of these SET domain-containing proteins are found either mutated, chromosomal translocated, or over-expressed when isolated from oncogenic cells. Therefore, we are interested in determining how mis-regulation and/or aberrant expression of these methyltransferases can lead to an oncogenic event and how aberrant histone methylation may play a role in oncogenesis. |
Selected Publications:
